NO. 15 PAGE 1
JULY 12, 2007
WEB SITE http://macedontown.net
A Regular Meeting of the Town Board of the Town of Macedon held July 12, 2007 at the Town Offices, 32 Main Street in the Village of Macedon, was called to order by Supervisor William Hammond at 7:30 P.M.
Pledge of Allegiance
Upon Roll Call, the following members of the Board were present:
Councilperson……….Paul Kenyon
Councilperson……….David Maul
Councilperson……….David McEwen
Supervisor…………...William Hammond
Absent: Councilperson……….Ken Nawrocki
Also Present: Town Attorney……….Anthony Villani
Town Engineer………Scott Allen
Town Clerk………..…Judy Gravino
RESOLVED the Board approves the minutes of June 28, 2007 with the following correction: Resolution No. 160 (07) Police Resignation – Weegar effective date should read July 5, 2007.
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
REPORTS – The following reports were submitted:
Building & Zoning
Town Clerk June Report
NYMIR Report
RESOLVED the Board approves the reports as submitted.
MOTION BY KENYON, SECONDED BY MAUL
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
Resolved the Town
Board refers the Special Use Permit application for Waste Management / High
Acres Landfill Expansion, to the Town and County Planning Boards.
MOTION BY KENYON, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION NO. 170 (07) Emil Weber Farm Agricultural Conservation Easement SEQRA Negative Declaration Resolution
WHEREAS, the
Town of Macedon
is undertaking an action to obtain an Agricultural Conservation Easement from
the following individual(s) and tax parcel(s):
·
Emil
Weber, Canandaigua Road, Macedon, NY 14502
·
Tax
ID # 62111-00-660319 (92.4 acres total)
AND WHEREAS, the conservation easement
area is located on the east side of Canandaigua Road, north of Cockle Road in
the Town of Macedon, Wayne County, New York, as further depicted on a survey
prepared by Robert Morris titled “Map of a Survey of Lands Owned by Emil Weber
Lots 18 & 19 Township 12 Range 3 Town of Macedon Wayne County New York”,
last revised January 22, 2007.
NO. 15 PAGE 2
JULY 12, 2007
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the
Town of Macedon, does hereby find and resolve as follows:
1.
The
proposed action is subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
2.
The
proposed action involves a Federal agency, the United States Department of
Agriculture.
3.
The
proposed action involves other agencies, including the NYS Department of
Agriculture and Markets, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Wayne
County.
4.
Using
the information available and comparing it with the thresholds set forth in
section 6 NYCRR 617.4, the action is found to have a preliminary classification
of Unlisted.
5.
The
Short Form EAF has been prepared by the Town Engineer to determine the
significance of the proposed action.
6.
The
proposed action is not located in a coastal area.
7.
The
proposed action is located in an agricultural district.
8.
A
non-coordinated Review for Unlisted Actions involving more than one agency has
been performed, subject to 617.6 (b)(4).
9.
More
than one agency is involved, and the Macedon Town Board is the lead agent.
10.
The
Macedon Town Board hereby determines that the proposed action is in general
conformance with the adopted town-wide Master Plan, and will not result in any
significant adverse environmental impacts, a Negative Declaration is declared,
and the Town Board hereby directs the Town Clerk to immediately file the
determination in accordance with section 6 NYCRR 617.12.
11.
The
Macedon Town Board, in reaching its decision to issue a Negative Declaration on
this action, acknowledges that other farms within the Town of Macedon are
currently in various stages of consideration for similar Agricultural
Conservation Easements. The Town Board
finds that, due to the nature of the action proposed, even if the cumulative
effect of all the Agricultural Conservation Easements were considered
simultaneously, this would not effect the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
12.
In
reaching this finding, the Town Board has:
(a) Considered the action as defined in sections 6 NYCRR 617.2 (b)
and 617.3 (g),
(b) Reviewed the EAF, the criteria contained
in subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.7 (c) and any other supporting information to
identify the relevant areas of environmental concern,
(c) Thoroughly analyzed the identified
relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the action may have a
significant adverse impact on the environment; and,
(d) Set forth its determination of significance
in this resolution, in addition to the corresponding long environmental
assessment form.
13.
In
determining significance, the Town Board has determined whether the proposed
Unlisted Action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the
impacts that may be reasonably expected to result from the proposed action
compared against the criteria in 6 NYCRR 617.
The criteria considered indicators of significant adverse impacts on the
environment were:
(a) A substantial adverse change in existing air
quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels;
a substantial increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in
potential for erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems;
(b) The removal or destruction of large
quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant
wildlife habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or
endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or
other significant adverse impacts to the natural resources;
(c) The impairment of the environmental
characteristics of a critical environmental area as designated pursuant to
section 617.14 (g);
(d) The creation of a material conflict with a
community’s current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted;
(e) The impairment of the character or quality of
important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or
of existing community or neighborhood character;
(f) A major
change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy;
(g) The
creation of a hazard to human health;
(h) A substantial change in the use or intensity
of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources or
in its capacity to support existing uses;
(i) The encouraging or attracting of a large
number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the
number of people who would come to such place absent the action;
(j) The creation of material demand for other
actions that would result in one or the above consequences;
(k) Changes in two or more elements of the
environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but
when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the
environment; or
(l) Two or more related actions undertaken,
funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant
impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or
more of the criteria of this subdivision.
NO. 15 PAGE 3
JULY 12, 2007
14. For the
purposes of determining whether an action may cause one of the consequences
listed above, the Town Board considered reasonably related long-term,
short-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts, including other
simultaneous or subsequent actions, which were;
(a)
Included
in any long range plan of which the action under consideration is a part;
(b)
Likely
to be undertaken as a result thereof, or
(c)
Dependent
thereon.
15. In
addition, the Town Board considered the significance of a likely consequence
(i.e., whether it is material, substantial, large or important) should be
assessed in connection with:
(a)
Its
setting (e.g., urban or rural);
(b)
Its
probability of occurrence;
(c)
Its
duration;
(d)
Its
irreversibility;
(e)
Its
geographic scope;
(f)
Its
magnitude; and
(g)
The
number of people affected.
MOTION BY HAMMOND, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION NO. 171 (07) Leo and Carolyn Rogers Farm Agricultural Conservation Easement SEQRA Negative Declaration Resolution
WHEREAS, the
Town of Macedon
is undertaking an action to obtain an Agricultural Conservation Easement from
the following individual(s) and tax parcel(s):
·
Leo
and Carolyn Rogers, 1247 Erie Street, Macedon, NY 14502
·
Tax
ID # 62111-00-867397/896267 (97.0 acres total)
AND WHEREAS, the conservation easement
area is located at the intersection of Erie Street and Lawrence Road in the
Town of Macedon, Wayne County, New York, as further depicted on a survey
prepared by BME Associates titled “Map of a Survey of 1170 & 1247 Erie
Street Road”, last revised December 12, 2006.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the
Town of Macedon, does hereby find and resolve as follows:
1.
The
proposed action is subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
2.
The
proposed action involves a Federal agency, the United States Department of
Agriculture.
3.
The
proposed action involves other agencies, including the NYS Department of
Agriculture and Markets, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Wayne
County.
4.
Using
the information available and comparing it with the thresholds set forth in
section 6 NYCRR 617.4, the action is found to have a preliminary classification
of Unlisted.
5.
The
Short Form EAF has been prepared by the Town Engineer to determine the
significance of the proposed action.
6.
The
proposed action is not located in a coastal area.
7.
The
proposed action is located in an agricultural district.
8.
A
non-coordinated Review for Unlisted Actions involving more than one agency has
been performed, subject to 617.6 (b)(4).
9.
More
than one agency is involved, and the Macedon Town Board is the lead agent.
10.
The
Macedon Town Board hereby determines that the proposed action is in general
conformance with the adopted town-wide Master Plan, and will not result in any
significant adverse environmental impacts, a Negative Declaration is declared,
and the Town Board hereby directs the Town Clerk to immediately file the
determination in accordance with section 6 NYCRR 617.12.
11.
The
Macedon Town Board, in reaching its decision to issue a Negative Declaration on
this action, acknowledges that other farms within the Town of Macedon are
currently in various stages of consideration for similar Agricultural
Conservation Easements. The Town Board
finds that, due to the nature of the action proposed, even if the cumulative
effect of all the Agricultural Conservation Easements were considered
simultaneously, this would not effect the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
12.
In
reaching this finding, the Town Board has:
(a) Considered the action as defined in sections 6 NYCRR 617.2
(b) and 617.3 (g),
(b) Reviewed the EAF, the criteria contained
in subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.7 (c) and any other supporting information to
identify the relevant areas of environmental concern,
(c) Thoroughly analyzed the identified
relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the action may have a
significant adverse impact on the environment; and,
(d) Set forth its determination of significance
in this resolution, in addition to the corresponding long environmental
assessment form.
NO. 15 PAGE 4
JULY 12, 2007
13.
In
determining significance, the Town Board has determined whether the proposed
Unlisted Action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the
impacts that may be reasonably expected to result from the proposed action
compared against the criteria in 6 NYCRR 617.
The criteria considered indicators of significant adverse impacts on the
environment were:
(a) A substantial adverse change in existing air
quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels;
a substantial increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in
potential for erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems;
(b) The removal or destruction of large
quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant
wildlife habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or
endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or
other significant adverse impacts to the natural resources;
(c) The impairment of the environmental
characteristics of a critical environmental area as designated pursuant to
section 617.14 (g);
(d) The creation of a material conflict with a
community’s current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted;
(e) The impairment of the character or quality of
important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or
of existing community or neighborhood character;
(f) A major
change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy;
(g) The
creation of a hazard to human health;
(h) A substantial change in the use or intensity
of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources or
in its capacity to support existing uses;
(i) The encouraging or attracting of a large
number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the
number of people who would come to such place absent the action;
(j) The creation of material demand for other
actions that would result in one or the above consequences;
(k) Changes in two or more elements of the
environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but
when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the
environment; or
(l) Two or more related actions undertaken,
funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant
impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or
more of the criteria of this subdivision.
14.
For the purposes of determining whether an action may cause
one of the consequences listed above, the Town Board considered reasonably
related long-term, short-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts,
including other simultaneous or subsequent actions, which were;
(d)
Included
in any long range plan of which the action under consideration is a part;
(e)
Likely
to be undertaken as a result thereof, or
(f)
Dependent
thereon.
15.
In addition, the Town Board considered the significance of a
likely consequence (i.e., whether it is material, substantial, large or
important) should be assessed in connection with:
(h)
Its
setting (e.g., urban or rural);
(i)
Its
probability of occurrence;
(j)
Its
duration;
(k)
Its
irreversibility;
(l)
Its
geographic scope;
(m)
Its
magnitude; and
(n)
The
number of people affected.
MOTION BY KENYON, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLUTION NO. 172 (07) Maier’s Mud Acre Farm Agricultural Conservation Easement SEQRA Negative Declaration Resolution
WHEREAS, the
Town of Macedon
is undertaking an action to obtain an Agricultural Conservation Easement from
the following individual(s) and tax parcel(s):
·
Paul
and Susan Maier, 1040 Canandaigua Road, Macedon, NY 14502
·
Tax
ID # 62111-00-615157 (53.0 acres total)
AND WHEREAS, the conservation easement
area is located on the east side of Canandaigua Road, north of the intersection
with Cockle Road in the Town of Macedon, Wayne County, New York, as further
depicted on a survey prepared by Warren McGrail, L.S. titled “Map of a Survey
of Pts. Of Lots 6, 7, 18 & 19, Township 12, Range 5, Town of Macedon, Wayne
County, New York”, last revised October 5, 2006.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town Board of the
Town of Macedon, does hereby find and resolve as follows:
1.
The
proposed action is subject to the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
2.
The
proposed action involves a Federal agency, the United States Department of
Agriculture.
NO. 15 PAGE 5
JULY 12, 2007
3.
The
proposed action involves other agencies, including the NYS Department of
Agriculture and Markets, the Natural Resources Conservation Service, and Wayne
County.
4.
Using
the information available and comparing it with the thresholds set forth in
section 6 NYCRR 617.4, the action is found to have a preliminary classification
of Unlisted.
5.
The
Short Form EAF has been prepared by the Town Engineer to determine the
significance of the proposed action.
6.
The
proposed action is not located in a coastal area.
7.
The
proposed action is located in an agricultural district.
8.
A
non-coordinated Review for Unlisted Actions involving more than one agency has
been performed, subject to 617.6 (b)(4).
9.
More
than one agency is involved, and the Macedon Town Board is the lead agent.
10.
The
Macedon Town Board hereby determines that the proposed action is in general
conformance with the adopted town-wide Master Plan, and will not result in any
significant adverse environmental impacts, a Negative Declaration is declared,
and the Town Board hereby directs the Town Clerk to immediately file the
determination in accordance with section 6 NYCRR 617.12.
11.
The
Macedon Town Board, in reaching its decision to issue a Negative Declaration on
this action, acknowledges that other farms within the Town of Macedon are
currently in various stages of consideration for similar Agricultural
Conservation Easements. The Town Board
finds that, due to the nature of the action proposed, even if the cumulative
effect of all the Agricultural Conservation Easements were considered
simultaneously, this would not effect the issuance of a Negative Declaration.
12.
In
reaching this finding, the Town Board has:
(a) Considered the action as defined in sections 6 NYCRR 617.2
(b) and 617.3 (g),
(b) Reviewed the EAF, the criteria contained
in subdivision 6 NYCRR 617.7 (c) and any other supporting information to
identify the relevant areas of environmental concern,
(c) Thoroughly analyzed the identified
relevant areas of environmental concern to determine if the action may have a
significant adverse impact on the environment; and,
(d) Set forth its determination of significance
in this resolution, in addition to the corresponding long environmental
assessment form.
13.
In
determining significance, the Town Board has determined whether the proposed
Unlisted Action may have a significant adverse impact on the environment, the
impacts that may be reasonably expected to result from the proposed action compared
against the criteria in 6 NYCRR 617.
The criteria considered indicators of significant adverse impacts on the
environment were:
(a) A substantial adverse change in existing air
quality, ground or surface water quality or quantity, traffic or noise levels;
a substantial increase in solid waste production; a substantial increase in
potential for erosion, flooding, leaching or drainage problems;
(b) The removal or destruction of large
quantities of vegetation or fauna; substantial interference with the movement
of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species; impacts on a significant
wildlife habitat area; substantial adverse impacts on a threatened or
endangered species of animal or plant, or the habitat of such a species; or
other significant adverse impacts to the natural resources;
(c) The impairment of the environmental
characteristics of a critical environmental area as designated pursuant to
section 617.14 (g);
(d) The creation of a material conflict with a
community’s current plans or goals as officially approved or adopted;
(e) The impairment of the character or quality of
important historical, archeological, architectural, or aesthetic resources or
of existing community or neighborhood character;
(f) A major
change in the use of either the quantity or type of energy;
(g) The
creation of a hazard to human health;
(h) A substantial change in the use or intensity
of use, of land including agricultural, open space or recreational resources or
in its capacity to support existing uses;
(i) The encouraging or attracting of a large
number of people to a place or places for more than a few days, compared to the
number of people who would come to such place absent the action;
(j) The creation of material demand for other
actions that would result in one or the above consequences;
(k) Changes in two or more elements of the
environment, no one of which has a significant impact on the environment, but
when considered together result in a substantial adverse impact on the
environment; or
(l) Two or more related actions undertaken,
funded or approved by an agency, none of which has or would have a significant
impact on the environment, but when considered cumulatively would meet one or
more of the criteria of this subdivision.
14.
For the purposes of determining whether an action may cause
one of the consequences listed above, the Town Board considered reasonably
related long-term, short-term, direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts,
including other simultaneous or subsequent actions, which were;
(g)
Included
in any long range plan of which the action under consideration is a part;
NO. 15 PAGE 6
JULY 12, 2007
(h)
Likely
to be undertaken as a result thereof, or
(i)
Dependent
thereon.
15.
In addition, the Town Board considered the significance of a
likely consequence (i.e., whether it is material, substantial, large or
important) should be assessed in connection with:
(o)
Its
setting (e.g., urban or rural);
(p)
Its
probability of occurrence;
(q)
Its
duration;
(r)
Its
irreversibility;
(s)
Its
geographic scope;
(t)
Its
magnitude; and
(u)
The
number of people affected.
MOTION BY KENYON, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLVED the Town Board authorizes the Town Accountant to make any budget adjustments necessary to cover the costs of the court audit.
MOTION BY KENYON, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLVED the Town Board authorize the Farmland Budgets for Rogers, Weber & Maier and authorizes the Supervisor to sign the vouchers as follows:
Rogers $341,590
Weber $213,414
Maier $153,195
MOTION BY MAUL, SECONDED BY HAMMOND
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
WHEREAS Michael Nelson was appointed to the position of PT Code Enforcement Officer effective January 15, 2007 for a 26 week probationary period which will conclude July 16, 2007 and
WHEREAS the Scott Allen has recommended Michael Nelson be appointed on a permanent part-time basis as Code Enforcement Officer
BE IT RESOLVED that Michael Nelson be appointed to the position of permanent PT Code Enforcement Officer effective July 16, 2007 at a salary of $16.00/hour.
MOTION BY MAUL, SECONDED BY KENYON
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
NO. 15 PAGE 7
JULY 12, 2007
RESOLUTION NO. 176 (07) MS-4 – COOPERATION TO COMPLY WITH THE FEDERAL PHASE II STORMWATER REGULATION IN ONTARIO AND WAYNE COUNTIES
WHEREAS a Public Hearing was held on May 24, 2007 regarding the Draft Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Annual Report and hearing no public comments or questions be it further
RESOLVED the Supervisor be authorized to sign the Intermunicipal Agreement among Ontario-Wayne Counties Storm Water Coalition consisting of Towns of Farmington, Macedon, Ontario, Victor, Walworth, Villages of Macedon, Victor, Ontario County on behalf of it DPW and Wayne County on behalf of its Highway Department effective 2/1/2007 through 1/31/2013, membership fee of $5,000 to be expensed from B8010.401 and authorize the Accountant to make any necessary budget adjustments.
MOTION BY MAUL, SECONDED BY KENYON
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
WHEREAS the State Education Department has reviewed the Town of Macedon’s grant proposal and has tentatively awarded the Town $72,000
For GIS
BE IT RESOLVED the Supervisor is authorized to sign the Grant Acceptance Form.
MOTION BY KENYON, SECONDED BY MAUL
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
Discussion followed on a permissive referendum the Town Board held with no public opposition on the property located on Rt. 31F that holds the water tower. Jim Smith is requesting an easement across the property that would be transferable. The Board cannot grant a perpetual easement that would bind future boards. An easement or lease for two (2) years is a possibility. An opinion from the State Comptroller inferred a 10-year period would be acceptable. Mr. Smith’s attorney, Mr. Gordon will contact the Town Attorney to discuss this matter.
Reminder – A retirement open house for Honorable Judge Fox will be held July 20, 2007 from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. in the Community Room.
Wayne County Department of Aging and Youth will be holding informational meetings on long-term care at 1519 Nye Rd., Lyons on July 17, August 28, September 18, October 17, November 1 and December 4, 2007. Call 946-5624 to register.
AUTHORIZE the Supervisor to enter into contract proposal to provide Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Implementation Services CHA Proposal No.: X17954-P1 with Clough Harbour contingent upon proper paperwork being submitted, receipt of grant, consultants submitting backup for percentage of completion and subject to Town Engineer approval.
MOTION BY MAUL, SECONDED BY KENYON
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
NO. 15 PAGE 8
JULY 12, 2007
RESOLVED the Board enters Executive Session at 8:30 p.m. to discuss the medical, financial, credit or employment history of a particular person or corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion, demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal or removal of a particular person or corporation.
MOTION BY HAMMOND, SECONDED BY KENYON
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLVED the Board return to Open Session at 9:25 p.m.
MOTION BY HAMMOND, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLVED the Board appoints Ronald Reinstein to the position of Town Justice, appointment effective 7/19/2007 to expire 12/31/2007 at an annual salary of $15,000 prorated
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Ronald Reinstein will be required to complete the Continuing Judicial Education Program For Towns to be held at SUNY Potsdam from 7/23/2007 through 7/27/2007 at town expense and be it further
RESOLVED that appointee may not act as Town Justice until successfully completing education course.
MOTION BY MCEWEN, SECONDED BY KENYON
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
ABSTRACT NO. 7-07
Claim Nos. 15364-15522 Expenditures in the amount of
$211,532.46
RESOLVED the Board authorizes the bills be paid as audited.
MOTION BY HAMMOND, SECONDED BY KENYON
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLVED the Board enters Executive Session at 9:31 p.m. to discuss proposed, pending or current litigation.
MOTION BY HAMMOND, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
RESOLVED the Board return to Open Session at 10:45 p.m.
MOTION BY HAMMOND, SECONDED BY MCEWEN
ROLL CALL VOTE: KENYON AYE, MAUL AYE, MCEWEN AYE,
NAWROCK ABSENT, HAMMOND AYE MOTION CARRIED
NO. 15 PAGE 9
JULY 12, 2007
Motion by Hammond, seconded by McEwen that the meeting be adjourned at 10:46 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by,
Judy W. Gravino, RMC
Macedon Town Clerk